2023's Biggest Auto Industry Mergers: How They Affect Consumers

The biggest auto-industry mergers and acquisitions of 2023 did not put two mass-market car brands under one badge overnight. Instead, consolidation happened where consumers feel it most often: at dealerships, in collision-repair supply chains, inside advanced safety systems, and in the global race to make EVs cheaper. The result is a car market with larger retailers, bigger parts suppliers, and deeper alliances between automakers and technology companies. For shoppers, that can mean better inventory and faster repairs in some cases — but also fewer local choices, more standardized pricing, and less room to negotiate.

The 2023 deals consumers should know

Calling every transaction a “merger” is imprecise. Several of the year’s most important moves were acquisitions, joint ventures, or strategic investments rather than full corporate combinations. But all of them changed the structure of the auto business and the way consumers buy, service, insure, or finance vehicles.

The major consumer-relevant deals included:

• Asbury Automotive’s $1.2 billion acquisition of Jim Koons Automotive, one of the largest U.S. dealership deals of the year, adding major Toyota, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Jeep, Honda, and other franchises in the Mid-Atlantic region.
• LKQ’s acquisition of Uni-Select, valued at about C$2.8 billion, which expanded LKQ’s reach in aftermarket parts, paint, collision-repair supplies, and Canadian distribution.
• Magna’s $1.525 billion acquisition of Veoneer Active Safety, strengthening one of the world’s largest supplier portfolios in cameras, radar, driver-assistance software, and electronic control units.
• Schaeffler’s agreement to acquire Vitesco Technologies, announced in 2023, combining a major mechanical supplier with a company focused on EV drive units, inverters, and power electronics.
• Stellantis’ €1.5 billion investment in Leapmotor, which gave the Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, Fiat, and Citroen parent a stake in a Chinese EV maker and created a joint venture to sell Leapmotor vehicles outside China.
• Renault and Geely’s powertrain combination, Horse, designed to scale production of gasoline, hybrid, and low-emission combustion systems at a time when EV growth is uneven by region.

The common thread is scale. Automakers and suppliers are trying to spread massive investment costs across more vehicles, more regions, and more brands. Dealers are trying to gain leverage in inventory, financing, and digital retail. Parts companies are trying to control more of the repair chain. Consumers will not see all of these changes immediately, but they will shape prices, vehicle availability, and service experience through the rest of the decade.

Dealership consolidation hits the showroom first

Asbury buys Jim Koons: bigger groups, fewer independent options

One of the most visible 2023 auto deals for U.S. consumers was Asbury Automotive Group’s acquisition of Jim Koons Automotive Companies for roughly $1.2 billion. The transaction added about 20 dealerships, 29 franchises, and several collision centers, largely in the Washington, D.C., Virginia, and Maryland markets. Asbury said the deal would add approximately $3 billion in annualized revenue.

This matters because dealership consolidation directly affects how shoppers encounter the market. A consumer looking for a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, Ford F-150, Lexus RX, Jeep Grand Cherokee, or Mercedes-Benz GLE in a large metro area may now find that multiple stores are controlled by the same ownership group. The building signage may still show different franchise brands, but pricing tools, finance products, used-car sourcing, advertising, and service processes can become more centralized.

That can be good for shoppers when it improves inventory visibility. A large dealer group can move vehicles between stores, offer broader used-car selection, and invest in online purchase tools that smaller retailers may not be able to build. If a buyer wants a specific trim — for example, a Toyota Highlander Hybrid Limited or Ford Bronco Badlands — a larger group may be more capable of locating it quickly.

The downside is negotiating leverage. When several local stores belong to the same parent company, consumers may have fewer truly independent quotes to compare. During the pandemic-era inventory shortage, some dealers added large market adjustments on high-demand models such as the Ford Bronco, Toyota RAV4 Prime, Kia Telluride, and Chevrolet Corvette. Inventory has improved since then, but consolidation can make pricing behavior more consistent across a region.

Consumer takeaway: Dealership consolidation can improve digital shopping and inventory access, but shoppers should widen their search radius and compare ownership groups, not just brand logos.

Lithia, AutoNation, and the service land grab

Asbury was not alone. Lithia & Driveway continued expanding its international footprint, including its 2023 agreement tied to Pendragon’s U.K. motor and fleet operations. AutoNation also pushed further into service with its acquisition of RepairSmith, a mobile repair provider, which closed in early 2023.

The strategic logic is clear: profit increasingly comes after the sale. New-vehicle margins rise and fall with inventory cycles, but service, parts, financing, insurance, and used cars provide recurring revenue. That is why dealer groups want more control over the customer relationship from the first online search to the 60,000-mile service appointment.

For consumers, this means the purchase process may become more polished but also more packaged. Expect more bundled service plans, tire-and-wheel protection, prepaid maintenance, ceramic coatings, extended warranties, and digital finance offers. Some are useful. Many are expensive. The larger the group, the more sophisticated the sales process becomes.

Parts and repairs: why LKQ-Uni-Select matters after a crash

LKQ’s acquisition of Uni-Select was one of 2023’s most important deals for anyone who owns a car, even if they never hear either company’s name. LKQ is a major distributor of alternative, recycled, remanufactured, and aftermarket collision parts. Uni-Select brought a strong Canadian parts network, the FinishMaster paint and body-supply business in the U.S., and additional distribution assets.

The deal was valued at about C$2.8 billion and closed in 2023. It strengthened LKQ’s position in the parts and collision-repair ecosystem at a time when repair costs are rising quickly. Modern vehicles are more expensive to fix because they carry more sensors, cameras, radar modules, aluminum panels, high-strength steel, battery components, and model-specific electronics.

Consider a common midsize crossover such as a Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, or Ford Escape. A minor front-end collision is no longer just a bumper cover and paint. It may involve parking sensors, a radar unit for adaptive cruise control, a camera bracket, grille shutters, headlamp modules, and calibration of driver-assistance systems. On EVs such as the Tesla Model Y, Ford Mustang Mach-E, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and Chevrolet Bolt EUV, repairs can also involve high-voltage safety procedures and brand-specific parts supply.

A larger aftermarket parts distributor can help repair shops source parts faster and potentially reduce repair times. That matters because long repair delays drive up rental-car costs and insurance claims. If LKQ can improve availability of replacement panels, lighting, cooling parts, and paint materials, consumers may benefit from shorter downtime.

But consolidation also creates concerns. Fewer large distributors can mean less competition for independent repair shops. If parts pricing rises, insurers may pass costs through in premiums. Auto insurance was already under pressure in 2023 because of higher repair severity, more expensive replacement vehicles, and increased theft claims for certain models. Parts-market consolidation will not determine premiums by itself, but it is part of the cost structure.

The practical advice is simple: after a collision, ask the repair shop what type of parts it plans to use — original equipment, aftermarket, recycled, or remanufactured — and confirm whether that choice affects the vehicle warranty, lease-return condition, or insurance claim. A cheaper part is not automatically worse, but the fit, calibration compatibility, and corrosion protection matter.

Supplier mega-deals shape EVs and safety tech

Magna buys Veoneer Active Safety

Magna’s $1.525 billion acquisition of Veoneer Active Safety was not a household-name merger, but it is highly relevant to new-car buyers. Magna already supplies body structures, powertrains, seating, mirrors, lighting, and complete vehicle manufacturing services. Veoneer Active Safety added cameras, radar, driver-monitoring technology, and advanced driver-assistance software.

These systems underpin features consumers now expect on mainstream cars: automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, traffic-sign recognition, and parking assistance. A decade ago, many of those features were luxury options. In 2023, they were standard or widely available on models such as the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Subaru Outback, Hyundai Sonata, Ford Explorer, and Chevrolet Equinox.

The consumer benefit is broader availability. Larger suppliers can spread development costs across more automakers and more platforms, helping safety features move downmarket. The risk is repair complexity. A windshield replacement on a vehicle with a forward-facing camera may require calibration. A bumper repair on a car with radar may require sensor alignment. That can turn what used to be a modest repair into a multi-step diagnostic job.

For shoppers, the right question is no longer only “Does it have adaptive cruise control?” It is also “How much will this system cost to repair?” A used luxury SUV with advanced driver-assistance features may look like a bargain until a headlamp, radar sensor, or camera module fails outside warranty.

Schaeffler and Vitesco: the hidden EV cost battle

Schaeffler’s 2023 agreement to acquire Vitesco Technologies was another supplier deal aimed at the electric transition. Schaeffler is known for bearings, engine components, transmission systems, and chassis technology. Vitesco, spun out of Continental, focuses on electrified powertrain components, including inverters, control electronics, and electric drive systems.

This is the kind of transaction that affects consumers indirectly but significantly. EV affordability depends on more than battery prices. Automakers also need cheaper, more efficient motors, inverters, thermal systems, onboard chargers, and power electronics. If suppliers can combine mechanical expertise with high-volume EV electronics, automakers may be able to reduce costs on future models.

That matters as the EV market moves beyond early adopters. A Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Ioniq 6, Volkswagen ID.4, Nissan Ariya, or Chevrolet Equinox EV has to compete not only on range, but also on monthly payment, insurance cost, charging speed, and long-term reliability. Supplier scale can help, but it does not guarantee lower sticker prices. Automakers may use savings to protect margins, fund battery plants, or offset regulatory costs.

Powertrain partnerships could decide what affordable cars look like

Stellantis and Leapmotor: pressure on EV prices

Stellantis’ €1.5 billion investment in Leapmotor was one of 2023’s most important global EV moves. The deal gave Stellantis a roughly 20% stake in the Chinese EV maker and created Leapmotor International, a joint venture led by Stellantis to sell Leapmotor vehicles outside Greater China.

The consumer impact is likely to be felt first in Europe, where smaller, lower-cost EVs are in high demand and Chinese brands are expanding quickly. Leapmotor’s T03 city car and C10 SUV show the strategy: use Chinese EV cost advantages and Stellantis’ distribution muscle to compete below or alongside models such as the Fiat 500e, Peugeot e-2008, Renault Megane E-Tech, Volkswagen ID.3, and MG4.

For U.S. shoppers, the immediate impact is limited. Tariffs, regulatory barriers, dealer laws, and political pressure make Chinese-built EVs a difficult proposition in the American market. But the competitive pressure still matters. If Chinese EV makers force prices down in Europe, global automakers will face more pressure to simplify platforms, cut battery costs, and offer lower-priced EVs elsewhere.

Renault and Geely’s Horse bets on hybrids and combustion staying relevant

Renault and Geely’s Horse powertrain venture reflects a more complicated truth: the EV transition is not moving at the same speed everywhere. The business was designed around global production of gasoline engines, hybrid systems, transmissions, and low-emission combustion technology, with plans involving multiple plants, research centers, and millions of units of annual capacity.

That may sound backward in an EV-focused industry, but consumers are still buying large numbers of hybrids and gasoline vehicles. In the U.S., Toyota’s hybrid-heavy lineup — including the Prius, Camry Hybrid, Corolla Hybrid, RAV4 Hybrid, Highlander Hybrid, and Sienna — has shown that efficiency gains can sell even when charging access remains uneven. In Europe, hybrids and small efficient engines remain important where urban emissions rules and fuel prices shape buying decisions. In emerging markets, charging infrastructure is often not ready for full EV adoption.

For consumers, the Renault-Geely move could help keep hybrid and efficient combustion options available longer, especially in markets where EVs remain too expensive. The trade-off is strategic complexity. Automakers must fund EVs, batteries, software, and charging partnerships while also maintaining legacy powertrains. That cost burden is one reason alliances and joint ventures are becoming more common.

Verdict: bigger companies may help supply, but they will not automatically lower prices

The biggest auto-industry mergers and acquisitions of 2023 were not about creating one new global car giant. They were about control: control of dealerships, repair parts, safety technology, EV supply chains, and affordable powertrains.

Consumers could benefit in several ways. Larger dealer groups may offer better online tools and broader inventory. Bigger parts distributors may improve repair availability. Supplier consolidation may help make advanced safety systems and EV components cheaper to build. Automaker partnerships may bring more low-cost EVs and efficient hybrids to market.

But none of those benefits is guaranteed. Consolidation can also reduce local competition, standardize dealer markups, increase supplier pricing power, and make repairs more dependent on proprietary tools and calibration procedures. The car may become easier to buy online, but harder to comparison-shop locally. The vehicle may be safer and more efficient, but more expensive to repair after a minor crash.

The smartest consumer response is to shop beyond the badge. Compare dealer ownership groups, not just dealerships. Ask repair shops about parts choices and calibration requirements. Price insurance before buying a vehicle with expensive sensors or body panels. And when considering an EV or hybrid, look beyond the headline range or mpg figure to warranty coverage, service access, battery policy, and parts availability.

The 2023 consolidation wave will not transform the market overnight. But it is already changing who has leverage. In the next phase of the auto industry, the companies that control the showroom, the software, the parts, and the powertrain will shape the consumer experience as much as the automaker whose badge is on the hood.

Affiliate disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. RevvedUpCars may earn a small commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.