Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT: Manual Engagement Showdown

The Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT debate isn’t about lap times anymore; it’s about whether you still want to feel like you’re driving the car, or merely supervising a very fast algorithm. One has a clutch pedal and weighs about as much as a pub jukebox. The other was engineered by Ford’s skunkworks to win Le Mans and intimidate Ferraris from three postcodes away.

This matters right now because 2026 is the year enthusiasts finally admit we’re losing tactile, oily, knuckle-scraping engagement in favor of launch-control fireworks. I’ve driven dozens of hypercars, from the McLaren 720S to the Ferrari SF90, and most are astonishingly quick yet emotionally beige. These two represent opposite philosophies of modern speed, and choosing between them says everything about what kind of car person you actually are.

So yes, this is the Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT showdown, framed around manual engagement, power delivery, and whether the modern hypercar experience has gone soft. One of these cars will make you a better driver. The other will make you feel like one.

The Contenders: Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT

The Donkervoort P24 RS is a carbon-fiber slingshot built by Dutch lunatics who think power steering is a moral weakness. It’s rear-wheel drive, manual-only, and tips the scales at roughly 1,500 kg soaking wet. This thing exists to make cars like the Porsche 911 GT3 and Ariel Atom feel overdressed.

The Ford GT, even in its most recent 2017–2022 form, is still the corporate mic drop. Carbon tub, active aero, paddle-shifted dual-clutch, and a Le Mans-winning resume that makes the McLaren Senna and Lamborghini Revuelto nod respectfully. It’s not just a car; it’s Ford’s rolling TED Talk on engineering excellence.

Design Face-Off: Skeleton Key vs Stealth Bomber

The Donkervoort looks like someone peeled the skin off a supercar to see what actually matters. Exposed weave, bolt-on panels, and aerodynamics that scream function over form. It’s controversial, sure, but so is drinking neat whisky at noon, and both are signs of strong character.

The Ford GT is a stealth bomber for the road, all flying buttresses and wind tunnels you could lose a cat in. It still looks futuristic in 2026, which tells you how far ahead of the curve Ford was. Park it next to a Ferrari 296 GTB or Aston Martin Valkyrie, and it somehow still looks like it arrived from tomorrow.

Interior & Tech: Pub Brawl vs Boardroom

Inside the Donkervoort, luxury is spelled A-L-C-A-N-T-A-R-A and nothing else. There’s a tiny screen, physical switches, and a seating position that feels like you’re wearing the car rather than sitting in it. If you’ve read our full P24 RS review, you’ll know this interior exists to serve driving, not Instagram.

The Ford GT’s interior is pure aerospace theater. Fixed seats, adjustable pedals, digital displays, and more modes than a Swiss Army knife. It’s brilliant, but also slightly aloof, like it’s reminding you that a team of engineers is quietly judging every input you make.

Performance & Power Delivery: Muscles vs Microchips

Here’s the controversial hot take: the Donkervoort feels faster at sane speeds than the Ford GT. Its turbo inline-five punches hard from 3,000 rpm, the throttle response is immediate, and the manual gearbox forces you to stay involved. It’s violent, noisy, and gloriously unfiltered.

The Ford GT, by contrast, delivers speed like a military operation. The twin-turbo V6 builds boost with relentless efficiency, the dual-clutch snaps through gears, and 200 mph arrives with unsettling ease. It’s devastatingly effective, but the power delivery is so polished it sometimes feels like the car is doing the driving for you.

Manual Engagement and the Modern Hypercar Experience

This is where the Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT argument gets philosophical. The Donkervoort’s manual gearbox is heavy, mechanical, and demands respect, much like a classic Porsche 911 or even a Singer DLS Turbo, which we raved about in our Singer DLS Turbo track review. You don’t just drive it; you negotiate with it.

The Ford GT represents the modern hypercar norm: faster, safer, and objectively better by every measurable metric. But in chasing perfection, it sacrifices some intimacy. It’s the same debate we’ve had about synthetic soundtracks and digital interfaces, something we explored in our piece on artificial engine sounds.

Value Breakdown: Rarity vs Relevance

Neither of these cars is “good value” in the traditional sense, unless your accountant has a sense of humor. The Donkervoort’s price buys you rarity, craftsmanship, and a driving experience that will never be replicated in an EV future. Maintenance is surprisingly reasonable for what it is, though parts availability requires patience.

The Ford GT’s value lies in its pedigree and collectability. It’s already a blue-chip modern classic, with prices holding strong on the secondary market. Running costs are eyewatering, fuel economy is laughable, and insurance will make you wince, but you’re buying a piece of motorsport history.

The Winner: Heart vs Head

If you want the fastest, most technically impressive machine, the Ford GT still dominates. It’s a masterclass in modern performance engineering, and Ford deserves applause for building something this focused. For official details, visit Ford Performance or check efficiency data at FuelEconomy.gov.

But if you believe driving should be a physical, emotional act, the Donkervoort wins. It captures something we’re rapidly losing, and that’s why, in the Donkervoort P24 RS vs Ford GT conversation, my heart sides with the Dutch madmen. Learn more directly from Donkervoort.

The Ford GT is a scalpel; the Donkervoort is a knuckle-duster. Both are brilliant, but only one will still make your hands shake after the engine stops.